Bugs

We would like to create a new invoice and take into account an already known reduction of a previous outstanding claim in the discount of payments. The payment amount can be adjusted, but the original invoice amount should not change then. It is best to keep this fixed. As can be seen in the screenshot, the payment amount was reduced to 4,831€ net and thus the actual invoice amount (left column) of 30,000€ was overwritten.

In the Employees tab, the time period (including productivity) is evaluated. Among other things, we use this to determine on a monthly basis whether employees have forgotten to record their working time on individual days (column number of working days without time bookings). It has happened to an employee that the number is marked with 1, but the employee actually has 3 days on which he has not recorded any working time.

The “Liquidity from today” chart shows different values on the dashboard than when you click on the magnifying glass. Is this a bug, or am I doing something wrong?

If you create a fee calculator for TGA in an offer, there are the following options a) “Own fee rate” > a separate fee calculator is created for each investment group. Accordingly, the investment groups are represented and billed with the commissioned service phases. b) “Same fee rate” > all investment groups are combined in a fee calculator. Although it says “Same fee rate”, a separate fee zone and fee rate can be specified for each investment group. All investment groups are calculated individually (eligible costs specified separately from each other), but integrated into a fee calculator. Accordingly, all investment groups are mapped and settled in a service phase 1-9. There should be the following options: “own fee calculator” > separately created fee calculator (one HR per investment group) “a fee calculator” + “separately recorded eligible costs” > jointly created fee calculator with fee zones and rates calculated separately “a fee calculator” + “jointly recorded eligible costs” > joint fee calculator with eligible costs combined into one amount See also the point: https://projo.canny.io/feature-requests/p/multiauswahl-kostengruppen-tga-im-hoai-rechner

When you select the X-invoice while creating an invoice, the fields are not (anymore) automatically pre-filled with the data stored in the contract overview. However, this would minimize double maintenance and the associated workload.

You can see how the% figures come about almost everywhere, but not in terms of the direct cost ratio and average salary. Is that still coming? Because I can't reproduce the number.

As the booking example in the screenshot shows, the labor type, which falls under the “working” category, is not assigned to working time in the booking mask. The amount of overtime is also missing on the month view under “Times”, while the working time is correctly calculated and displayed under “AZ account”.

When creating an offer on which the variable %TREATY_NAME% is to be displayed, it is not updated when the contract name is changed. The old name is then still in the variable. In principle, this means that you cannot use the variable, because after creating a contract in the project, the project name is automatically used as the contract name by the program. If you then change the contract name in step 2 and then create an offer or other document, the original, now invalid contract name always appears. So if you want to use the contract name, you have to enter it manually.

When regenerating an invoice, a security deposit set later on is not taken into account. The invoice must be deleted and reissued.

Projo currently has the AG share of freelancers. In this case, there is no AG share.