Bugs

The sales tax rate is currently set to 0% in the claim amount on the 1st page of a 0€ invoice, even though 19% is stated for the invoice. This is wrong and a big mistake for tax purposes, because, for example, in the case of a 0€ final invoice, 0% sales tax is shown on all previous payment invoices. The sales tax rate must be correctly stated even with a 0€ invoice.

For contract services that are created in the status “on request”, the contract amounts of the subcontractors are not included in the payment plan and not in the evaluation and cannot be scheduled.

If I create an offer from a specific offer template, the offer number generated by projo has as “%OFFER_SUP%” the project abbreviation of the original project from which the offer template was created, not the project abbreviation of the current project. Appears at least when an offer is created without contract assignment or if project abbreviations have not yet been assigned.

We have already had this topic several times - please check the problem again so that attachments from a test draft - which was never transferred to Projo - do not appear in the invoice - thank you.

When copy/paste into text fields, there are always special characters that only appear in the PDF. This also occurs when plain text or with APFE+shift+v is inserted. The same applies to line breaks that are invisible in the text field. I ask again and again for a solution. e.g. reintroducing the display of the HTML text module. plea

The default format for offers is: “%offer_sup-offer-%yy-%number” For all offers without contract assignment, the abbreviation of an old project appears first: '"RS4" There shouldn't really be anything here. What can we do?

If you use the reimbursements for expenses, they are called “travel expenses” in the PDF (and in the editing tab). + In addition, there is a “travel expenses” item in the office area under Office, but none for “reimbursements”; both are summarized under the former.

Changes have apparently been made to the “Benefits and Payments” annex to the invoice which have the effect that the “descriptions” in the benefit items are presented as standard When the descriptions are displayed, a description that has been entered once in an expenditure item of the type hours in the contract structure appears again in all sub-items. About 1: Not a bug, but it would be easier to understand if there were a notice when there were changes in existing billing processes. On 2nd: apparently a bug. See screenshot below as an example.

The page number is shown elsewhere in the time journal. This can lead to an overlap with the layout uploaded behind it. It works both in the preview and in the advance invoices. A specific example can be found in the internal comments.

When preparing offers for development plans, the names of the service phases do not comply with the HOAI requirements