Feature Requests

The technical option of sorting in the contract structure is currently very cumbersome. You can only go up or down one line at a time with a performance or performance group. If I now have 30 or more achievements then I click 29 times to get the performance from the very bottom to the very top...

Depending on whether a project has more than one contract, the overview page looks different (if the project only has one contract, the project overview page is not displayed at all, only the overview page of the single contract). When browsing through projects with and without contracts, the overview page should always provide the same information at a glance at the top, in particular the values from the contract list:

In internal projects, which are approved on a lump sum basis for all employees, it is currently not possible to restrict employees to individual services in order to prevent them from being able to book at will.

If services are defined in a contract for billing according to expenditure and more hours are booked on them than are covered by the order amount, then the value of the service level exceeds the defined order amount. This is only correct if the order amount of an expense item is defined as “estimated” or “increased by postings.” If it is defined as a “contractual maximum”, the value of the performance level must be capped at this maximum (and thus a performance level of 100%) - accordingly, this capped performance value must also be used in project controlling, data warehouse and billing!