Deployment planning: Open subsequent years
planned
Isabel
planned
Isabel
Merged in a post:
Deployment planning - calculation of costs for the whole year although planned on a pro rata basis
Birgit Pfisterer
A planned output falls within a period of time that is no longer graphically shown in months but as a year in the projo deployment planning (currently from 2026).
Even if this benefit is only processed for a few months in the year in question, the costs for a scheduled employee are calculated not only for the defined period, but for the entire year.
Although the pro rata costs are correctly charged to the service, the difference in the ma:in's costs for the entire year is still apportioned to the project.
Isabel
closed
old
K
Kay Krautz
The main problem is that you can't reasonably plan on a pro rata basis for 2026.
Chris Robin Wübbeler
Was addressed and wished for again today, Arne Semmler. Is there anything planned?
Arne Semmler
Chris Robin Wübbeler: In the current implementation, it is not technically possible to “unfold” this just for one project, but this must always be implemented for the entire tenant (additional months of a year twelve-fold the number of entries to be managed), which then affects all capacity views of the office, every employee and the planning of all projects and contracts, which leads to performance losses. This feature is included in the mock-up for the operational planning revision currently under development; it has not yet been decided whether it will be implemented from the outset.
T
Thorsten Gustav Chalupa
The same request is now more common for months->weeks
Arne Semmler
It should also be possible to add additional months/quarters/years for each project: