Feature Requests

Please allow colleagues to activate only for individual contracts and not always immediately for the entire project, including all contracts... this unnecessarily overfills time recording. Thank you!

In expert mode, there is no column in the contract structure that shows your own order amount per position and per division group. It would therefore be useful to have a “Order total” column that is structured in the same way as the “Contract amount” column, which contains the information “from this for sub”. This is because the order amount for a division group, including sub-services, is included in the offer, but not in the contract structure. I think it's important to be able to see the order total for individual items and divisional groups quickly and without a calculator.

The information “Performance level last changed before... “, which appears in the Power level column when you mouse-over, should also be available as a column.

We would like to use internal office fields in the area of projects to evaluate various characteristics, e.g. usage, certification, funding, etc. Unfortunately, the fields are only ever displayed in the overview of the main order. In the case of sub-contracts (e.g. all competitions of a year in a project), the fields cannot be filled out separately, so this cannot be filtered continuously. That would be an interesting improvement for us.

Project overview list includes performance levels and results etc. of archived contracts in the calculation - project managers therefore receive false statements about the status of their ongoing projects when they read them from the project overview. Even if you click on “only show active ones”, it makes no difference.

Presentation of liquidity planning analogous to overall office liquidity planning within a project rider.

It would be very helpful if the filters were sorted at least alphabetically. There is currently a lot of confusion (see screenshot). Since there is no search within the filters and filtering by conditions does not help with different spellings or abbreviations, this would be an important addition.

In the project settings, projo offers the option to create and change partial service templates. Basic tables are already provided on the project side. It would be good if these were provided/curated as immutable bases of, so that they are not accidentally modified/overwritten. A distinction should also be made graphically between a list provided by projo and an individual list.

If the contract documents, contract attachments, offers, order extensions, contract documents of the subcontractors are to be stored sensibly in projo, it would be necessary, in our opinion, that the sorting can be carried out “in tabular form” - i.e. at least one sorting by document name, it would be better to also include the subcontractors in the table and not to organize them into individual static groups as is currently the case.

Hi everyone, At the moment, we often have the problem that we supervise several trades and/or construction phases in a project that have different acceptance dates. Currently, you can only enter an acceptance in the contract overview. It would be great if you could store various data to keep track of things. Thank you guys!